<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Futurist &#124; By Rebecca Keegan &#187; Culture Wars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jamescameronbook.com/category/culture-wars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jamescameronbook.com</link>
	<description>The Futurist: The Life and Films of James Cameron &#124; by Rebecca Keegan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 01:16:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Do the Na&#8217;vi Eat Quiche?</title>
		<link>http://jamescameronbook.com/2010/01/22/warrenolney/</link>
		<comments>http://jamescameronbook.com/2010/01/22/warrenolney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rkeegan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Avatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture Wars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamescameronbook.com/?p=226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Avatar racist/anti-American/anti-monotheist? 
And, perhaps most importantly, do the Na&#8217;vi eat quiche? 
All topics tackled in this roundtable interview on Warren Olney&#8217;s KCRW show  To The Point featuring conservative film critic Michael Medved, io9 editor Annalee Newitz, Otis College of Art &#038; Design Film Studies Senior Lecturer Scarlet Cheng, Columbia College Professor of Philosophy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is <em>Avatar</em> racist/anti-American/anti-monotheist? </p>
<p>And, perhaps most importantly, <strong>do the Na&#8217;vi eat quiche? </strong></p>
<p>All topics tackled in this roundtable interview on <a href="http://www.kcrw.com/people/olney_warren?role=host">Warren Olney</a>&#8217;s KCRW show <em> To The Point</em> featuring conservative film critic <a href="http://www.michaelmedved.com/">Michael Medved</a>, io9 editor <a href="http://io9.com/338371/meet-the-bloggers-at-io9">Annalee Newitz</a>, Otis College of Art &#038; Design Film Studies Senior Lecturer Scarlet Cheng, Columbia College Professor of Philosophy Stephen Asma and <a href="http://jamescameronbook.com/author/">yours truly. </a></p>
<p><object width="424" height="268"><param name="movie" value="http://www.kcrw.com/news/programs/tp/tp100122avatar_science_ficti/embed-audio"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.kcrw.com/news/programs/tp/tp100122avatar_science_ficti/embed-audio" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="424" height="268"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jamescameronbook.com/2010/01/22/warrenolney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Times quotage</title>
		<link>http://jamescameronbook.com/2010/01/21/new-york-times-quotage/</link>
		<comments>http://jamescameronbook.com/2010/01/21/new-york-times-quotage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rkeegan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Avatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terminator]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamescameronbook.com/?p=212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Times&#8216; Dave Itzkoff has a cool front page piece on the controversies swirling around Avatar in which I hold forth on, among other things, the use of allegory in Cameron&#8217;s films:
Ms. Keegan said that it was possible to read “The Terminator,” his breakthrough 1984 movie, as an anti-technology polemic, an anti-war film or a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <em>Times</em>&#8216; Dave Itzkoff has a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/20/movies/20avatar.html?hpw">cool front page piece</a> on the controversies swirling around Avatar in which I hold forth on, among other things, the use of allegory in Cameron&#8217;s films:</p>
<p><em>Ms. Keegan said that it was possible to read “The Terminator,” his breakthrough 1984 movie, as an anti-technology polemic, an anti-war film or a modern gloss on the birth of Jesus.</p>
<p>“Or,” she said, “ you could just watch it as a movie where Arnold Schwarzenegger stomps around like a robot.”</em></p>
<p>The also story quotes sci fi site io9&#8217;s editor, Annalee Newitz, who wrote one of the <a href="http://io9.com/5422666/when-will-white-people-stop-making-movies-like-avatar">sharpest cultural critiques</a> of Avatar I&#8217;ve read yet.<br />
<em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jamescameronbook.com/2010/01/21/new-york-times-quotage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

